Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 197 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 280 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.2 seconds | 8.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK 2000 engine produces 4 HP more power than Mercedes CLK 1997, the torque is the same for both cars. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 | 9.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mercedes CLK 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes CLK 2000 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 1997, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK 2000 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 1997. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 650 km in combined cycle | 620 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 620 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2000 and Mercedes CLK 1997 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`850 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |