Mercedes CLK 2000 vs BMW 5 series 1995
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 197 HP | 170 HP | |
Torque: | 280 NM | 245 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.1 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
Mercedes CLK is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes CLK engine produces 27 HP more power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 35 NM more than BMW 5 series. Thanks to more power Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 9.4 | |
Mercedes CLK consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CLK could require 30 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 640 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
860 km on highway | 970 km on highway | ||
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.78 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.44 m | |
Mercedes CLK is smaller. Mercedes CLK is 21 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 460 litres | |
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Mercedes CLK has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`870 | 1`985 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Mercedes CLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |