Mercedes CLK 2000 vs Mercedes C class 2000
Body: | Coupe | Sedan | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 163 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 230 NM | 230 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.7 seconds | |
Mercedes CLK and Mercedes C class have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 | 9.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
By specification Mercedes CLK consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes CLK consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes C class. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.57 m | 4.53 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.37 m | 1.43 m | |
Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`500 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | average | |
Mercedes CLK has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mercedes C class has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2000 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Mercedes C klase has
| |