Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Mercedes CLK 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 170 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
|
Mercedes CLK 2002 is a more dynamic driving. Mercedes CLK 2005 engine produces 20 HP less power than Mercedes CLK 2002, whereas torque is 60 NM less than Mercedes CLK 2002. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK 2005 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes CLK 2005 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2002, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK 2005 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes CLK 2005 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 880 km with real consumption | 840 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.41 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2005 is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 435 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |