Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes CLK engine produces 154 HP less power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 87 NM less than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 13.0 | |
|
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CLK consumes 6.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 930 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 62 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| Mercedes CLK gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.41 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller, but slightly higher. Mercedes CLK is 12 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 14 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 435 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes CLK has 85 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. The Ford Mustang may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |