Mercedes CLK 2005 vs BMW 5 series 2003

 
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
BMW 5 series
2003 - 2005
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Diesel3.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 150 HP218 HP
Torque: 340 NM500 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.2 seconds7.1 seconds
BMW 5 series is a more dynamic driving.
Mercedes CLK engine produces 68 HP less power than BMW 5 series, whereas torque is 160 NM less than BMW 5 series. Due to the lower power, Mercedes CLK reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.46.9
The Mercedes CLK is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mercedes CLK consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series, which means that by driving the Mercedes CLK over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 960 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.84 m
Width: 1.74 m1.85 m
Height: 1.41 m1.47 m
Mercedes CLK is smaller.
Mercedes CLK is 19 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres520 litres
BMW 5 series has more luggage space.
Mercedes CLK has 85 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.2 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg): no data2`155
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Mercedes CLK has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than Mercedes CLK, so Mercedes CLK quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 48004600
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
BMW 5 sērija has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv