Mercedes CLK 1998 vs Mercedes ML 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CLK
1998 - 1999
Mercedes ML
2001 - 2005
Body: CabrioCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mercedes CLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes ML can be equipped with four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 3.2 (petrol)2.7 - 5.4 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 136 - 224 HP163 - 347 HP
Torque: 190 - 315 NM310 - 560 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.1 - 12.8 seconds6.7 - 12.2 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.4 - 10.69.4 - 14.8
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes ML.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.64 m
Width: 1.72 m1.85 m
Height: 1.38 m1.82 m
Mercedes CLK is smaller.
Mercedes CLK is 7 cm shorter than the Mercedes ML, 13 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 44 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 237 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
350 litresno data
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mercedes ML, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`013~ 3`481
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
low
Average price (€): 38003400
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Mercedes ML has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv