Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Mercedes CLK 2005

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Body: CabrioCoupe
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 6.21.8 - 6.2

Performance

Power: 163 - 481 HP150 - 481 HP
Torque: 240 - 630 NM240 - 630 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.7 - 10.5 seconds4.7 - 10.4 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.5 - 14.46.4 - 14.2
Mercedes CLK 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 2005. On average, Mercedes CLK 2005 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2005.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.65 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.42 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2005 and Mercedes CLK 2005 are practically the same length.
Trunk capacity: 390 litres435 litres
Mercedes CLK 2005 has more luggage space.
Mercedes CLK 2005 has 45 litres less trunk space than the Mercedes CLK 2005.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`182~ 2`071
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 72004800
Pros and Cons:
    Mercedes CLK has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • roomier boot
    • fewer faults
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv