Mercedes CLK 2005 vs BMW 6 series 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.8 - 6.2 (petrol, diesel) | 3.0 - 4.8 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 - 481 HP | 258 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 630 NM | 300 - 490 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.7 - 10.5 seconds | 5.7 - 7.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.5 - 14.4 | 9.6 - 13.0 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 6 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.74 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
Mercedes CLK is smaller, but higher. Mercedes CLK is 17 cm shorter than the BMW 6 series, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 390 litres | 300 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 350 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes CLK has 90 litres more trunk space than the BMW 6 series. The BMW 6 series may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.6 metres less than that of the BMW 6 series, which means Mercedes CLK can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`182 | ~ 2`194 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 7200 | 11 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 6 sērija has
| |