Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Nissan 200 SX 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 4.3 | 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 279 HP | 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 400 NM | 265 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | 7.5 - 8.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 11.2 | 8.8 - 8.9 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Nissan 200 SX. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.30 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 5 cm longer than the Nissan 200 SX, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 307 litres | |
|
Mercedes CLK has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CLK has 113 litres more trunk space than the Nissan 200 SX. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 1.1 metres more than that of the Nissan 200 SX, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`853 | ~ 1`780 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
Nissan 200 SX has
| |