Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Mercedes CLK 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 4.3 | 2.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 279 HP | 136 - 347 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 400 NM | 190 - 510 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 11.2 | 9.3 - 11.7 | |
|
Mercedes CLK 1997 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 1999. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 1997 and Mercedes CLK 1999 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`853 | ~ 1`869 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
| |