Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Mercedes C class 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Mercedes CLK 1997 - 1999	Mercedes C class 2000 - 2004
Body:	Coupe	Sedan
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD)	Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
	Mercedes CLK is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines:	2.0 - 4.3 (petrol)	1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)
Performance
Power:	136 - 279 HP	115 - 354 HP
Torque:	190 - 400 NM	185 - 540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	6.3 - 11.5 seconds	5.2 - 12.1 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.4 - 11.2	6.1 - 11.5
	Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.57 m	4.53 m
Width:	1.72 m	1.73 m
Height:	1.37 m	1.43 m
	Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	420 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	10.7 meters	10.8 meters
	The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`853	~ 1`500

Safety:	no data
Quality:	no data	average
Average price (€):	1400	1600
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes CLK has only petrol engines available lower fuel consumption lower price	Mercedes C klase has available with 4x4 drive petrol and diesel engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Mercedes C class 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions