Mercedes CLK 1997 vs Honda Prelude 1996
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mercedes CLK is available with rear wheel drive, while Honda Prelude can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 4.3 | 2.0 - 2.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 279 HP | 133 - 200 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 400 NM | 179 - 211 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | 7.5 - 10.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 - 11.2 | 9.2 - 10.4 | |
|
On average, the Mercedes CLK petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Honda Prelude. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.54 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.32 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 3 cm longer than the Honda Prelude, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.3 metres less than that of the Honda Prelude. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`853 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Honda Prelude has
| |