Mercedes CLK 1999 vs BMW 5 series 1995

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CLK
1999 - 2002
BMW 5 series
1995 - 2000
Body: CoupeSedan
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 2.0 - 5.4 (petrol)2.0 - 4.4 (petrol, diesel)

Performance

Power: 136 - 347 HP115 - 286 HP
Torque: 190 - 510 NM190 - 440 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 5.4 - 11.5 seconds6.2 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.3 - 11.75.9 - 12.2
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.57 m4.78 m
Width: 1.72 m1.80 m
Height: 1.37 m1.44 m
Mercedes CLK is smaller.
Mercedes CLK is 21 cm shorter than the BMW 5 series, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 7 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 420 litres460 litres
BMW 5 series has more luggage space.
Mercedes CLK has 40 litres less trunk space than the BMW 5 series.
Turning diameter: 10.7 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.3 metres less than that of the BMW 5 series.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`869~ 2`077
Safety: no data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 20002200
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • only petrol engines available
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 5 sērija has
  • petrol and diesel engines available
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv