Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes CLK 1997
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 | 2.0 - 4.3 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 136 - 279 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 190 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | 6.3 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.7 | 9.4 - 11.2 | |
|
Mercedes CLK 1999 petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 1997. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 1999 and Mercedes CLK 1997 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 420 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`869 | ~ 1`853 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Mercedes CLK has
| |