Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes C class 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

	Mercedes CLK 1999 - 2002	Mercedes C class 2000 - 2004
Body:	Coupe	Sedan
Gearbox:	Manual/Automatic	Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:	Rear wheel drive (RWD)	Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
	Mercedes CLK is available only with rear wheel drive, while Mercedes C class can be equipped with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines:	2.0 - 5.4 (petrol)	1.8 - 3.2 (petrol, diesel)
Performance
Power:	136 - 347 HP	115 - 354 HP
Torque:	190 - 510 NM	185 - 540 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:	5.4 - 11.5 seconds	5.2 - 12.1 seconds
	Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):	9.3 - 11.7	6.1 - 11.5
	On average, the Mercedes CLK petrol engines consume nearly the same amount of fuel per 100 km as Mercedes C class. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions
Length:	4.57 m	4.53 m
Width:	1.72 m	1.73 m
Height:	1.37 m	1.43 m
	Mercedes CLK is 4 cm longer than the Mercedes C class, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CLK is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity:	420 litres	no data
Turning diameter:	10.7 meters	10.8 meters
	The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mercedes C class.
Gross weight (kg):	~ 1`869	~ 1`500

Safety:	no data
Quality:	average	average
Average price (€):	2000	1600
Pros and Cons:	Mercedes CLK has only petrol engines available	Mercedes C klase has available with 4x4 drive petrol and diesel engines available fewer faults lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail Facebook Twitter e-mail

Mercedes CLK 1999 vs Mercedes C class 2000

Performance

Fuel consumption

Dimensions