Mercedes CLK 1999 vs BMW 3 series 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 5.4 | 1.8 - 3.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 136 - 347 HP | 116 - 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 190 - 510 NM | 175 - 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 11.5 seconds | 6.5 - 12 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.3 - 11.7 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Mercedes CLK petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.57 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.37 m | 1.37 m | |
| Mercedes CLK is 8 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 420 litres | 410 litres | |
| Mercedes CLK has 10 litres more trunk space than the BMW 3 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CLK is 0.7 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mercedes CLK can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`869 | ~ 1`878 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CLK has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |