Mercedes CLK 2005 vs Mercedes CLK 2002

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CLK
2005 - 2009
Mercedes CLK
2002 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 6.21.8 - 5.4

Performance

Power: 150 - 481 HP163 - 367 HP
Torque: 240 - 630 NM240 - 510 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.7 - 10.4 seconds5.2 - 9.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.4 - 14.26.7 - 12.8
Mercedes CLK 2005 petrol engines consumes on average 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than Mercedes CLK 2002. On average, Mercedes CLK 2005 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mercedes CLK 2002.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.64 m
Width: 1.74 m1.74 m
Height: 1.41 m1.41 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mercedes CLK 2005 is 1 cm longer than the Mercedes CLK 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 435 litres435 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters10.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`071~ 2`062
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average

average
Average price (€): 48002800
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CLK has
  • lower fuel consumption for petrol engines
  • fewer faults
Mercedes CLK has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv