Mercedes CL 2002 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 304 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 427 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes CL engine produces 2 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 33 NM more than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 13.0 | |
|
The Mercedes CL is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mercedes CL consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mustang, which means that by driving the Mercedes CL over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 61 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 460 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 670 km on highway | ||
| Mercedes CL gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Mercedes CL is 23 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 350 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CL has 100 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
| |