Mercedes CL 2002 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 5.0 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 306 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 460 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.5 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Mercedes CL engine produces 53 HP more power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 120 NM more than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.9 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.6 l/100km | 11.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mercedes CL consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mercedes CL could require 180 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mercedes CL consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 88 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 630 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 780 km on highway | ||
| 750 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Mercedes CL gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.99 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Mercedes CL is smaller. Mercedes CL is 9 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL is 8 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 456 litres | |
| Mercedes CL has 6 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mercedes CL is 0.4 metres less than that of the Dodge Charger, which means Mercedes CL can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |