Mercedes CL 2010 vs Dodge Charger 2010

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mercedes CL
2010 - 2013
Dodge Charger
2010 - 2015
Gearbox: Automatic Automatic
Engines: 4.7 - 6.03.6 - 6.4

Performance

Power: 435 - 630 HP296 - 477 HP
Torque: 700 - 1000 NM353 - 637 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 4.4 - 4.9 secondsn/a seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.5 - 14.310.0 - 13.8
Mercedes CL petrol engines consumes on average 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Charger.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Ground clearance: 127 - 133 mm (5 - 5.2 inches)111 - 128 mm (4.4 - 5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mercedes CL can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds.

Dimensions

Length: 5.07 m5.08 m
Width: 1.87 m1.91 m
Height: 1.42 m1.48 m
Mercedes CL is smaller.
Mercedes CL is 1 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 490 litres467 litres
Mercedes CL has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes CL has 23 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers.
Turning diameter: 11.8 meters11.8 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`598no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 17 000no data
Pros and Cons: Mercedes CL has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ground clearance
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv