Mercedes CL 2010 vs Chevrolet Camaro 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Mercedes CL is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 4.7 - 6.0 | 3.6 - 6.2 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 435 - 630 HP | 312 - 426 HP | |
| Torque: | 700 - 1000 NM | 377 - 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 4.9 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 14.3 | 11.1 | |
|
Mercedes CL petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.07 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.38 m | |
| Mercedes CL is 23 cm longer than the Chevrolet Camaro, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes CL is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 490 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Mercedes CL has more luggage capacity. Mercedes CL has 170 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Camaro. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`598 | ~ 1`737 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 17 000 | 17 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes CL has
|
Chevrolet Camaro has
| |