Mercedes C class 2011 vs Ford Galaxy 2010
Body: | Coupe | Minivan / MPV | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.1 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 204 HP | 140 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
Mercedes C class is more dynamic to drive. Mercedes C class engine produces 64 HP more power than Ford Galaxy, whereas torque is 180 NM more than Ford Galaxy. Thanks to more power Mercedes C class reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.9 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 6.2 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
The Mercedes C class is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mercedes C class consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy, which means that by driving the Mercedes C class over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mercedes C class consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Galaxy. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1200 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
1430 km on highway | 1420 km on highway | ||
950 km with real consumption | 980 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Ford Galaxy) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mercedes C class) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 560'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Ford Galaxy engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 14 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 13 other car models, including Mercedes E klase, Mercedes ML, Mercedes A klase | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Ford Mondeo, Ford Focus, Ford S-Max, Ford C-Max | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mercedes C class might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.59 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.41 m | 1.76 m | |
Mercedes C class is smaller. Mercedes C class is 23 cm shorter than the Ford Galaxy, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mercedes C class is 36 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 450 litres | 390 litres | |
Mercedes C class has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mercedes C class has 60 litres more trunk space than the Ford Galaxy. The Ford Galaxy may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mercedes C class is 1.1 metres less than that of the Ford Galaxy, which means Mercedes C class can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`505 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | high | low | |
Mercedes C class has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Ford Galaxy has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than Mercedes C class, so Mercedes C class quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 25 800 | 10 400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mercedes C klase has
|
Ford Galaxy has
| |