Mazda Xedos 9 1993 vs Volvo S80 1998
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 200 HP | |
Torque: | 216 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.1 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 64 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Mazda Xedos 9 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.0 | |
The Mazda Xedos 9 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Mazda Xedos 9 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 720 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 9 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 9 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda MX-6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volvo 960, Volvo S90, Volvo V90 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.82 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
Mazda Xedos 9 and Volvo S80 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 440 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
Mazda Xedos 9 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.5 meters | 12 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Volvo S80, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`060 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 1200 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |