Mazda Xedos 9 2001 vs Volvo S80 1999
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.5 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 164 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 212 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 11 seconds | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 engine produces 24 HP more power than Volvo S80, but torque is 78 NM less than Volvo S80. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.7 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo S80 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda Xedos 9 could require 645 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda Xedos 9 consumes 4.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 610 km with real consumption | 1250 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Xedos 9 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda MX-6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo 850, Volvo S70 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.88 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.43 m | |
| Mazda Xedos 9 is 6 cm longer than the Volvo S80, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Xedos 9 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 430 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1106 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Mazda Xedos 9 has 10 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. This could mean that the Mazda Xedos 9 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Xedos 9 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Mazda Xedos 9 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`940 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Xedos 9 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |