Mazda Verisa 2004 vs Renault Clio 2008

 
Mazda Verisa
2004 - 2015
Renault Clio
2008 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 1.5 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 113 HP112 HP
Torque: 140 NM151 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds10.4 seconds
Mazda Verisa engine produces 1 HP more power than Renault Clio, but torque is 11 NM less than Renault Clio.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): no data6.7
Fuel tank capacity: 45 litres55 litres

Engines

Engine production duration: 13 years25 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Dacia Duster
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Clio might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.98 m4.20 m
Width: 1.97 m1.71 m
Height: 1.53 m1.51 m
Mazda Verisa is 23 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 26 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Verisa is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 335 litres439 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1175 litresno data
Renault Clio has more luggage space.
Mazda Verisa has 104 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda Verisa is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda Verisa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3751`665
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data2800
Pros and Cons: Mazda Verisa has
  • timing chain engine
  • better manoeuvrability
Renault Clio has
  • timing belt engine
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv