Mazda Verisa 2004 vs Renault Clio 2008
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda Verisa is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Renault Clio can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 | 1.1 - 1.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 113 HP | 75 - 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 140 NM | 105 - 151 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.4 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 5.9 - 6.7 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.98 m | 4.20 m | |
| Width: | 1.97 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.51 m | |
| Mazda Verisa is 23 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 26 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Verisa is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 335 litres | 439 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1175 litres | no data | |
|
Renault Clio has more luggage space. Mazda Verisa has 104 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda Verisa is 0.7 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mazda Verisa can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`375 | ~ 1`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Verisa has
|
Renault Clio has
| |