Mazda RX-8 2008 vs BMW 3 series 2007

 
Mazda RX-8
2008 - 2012
BMW 3 series
2007 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.3 Petrol2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 232 HP177 HP
Torque: 216 NM350 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.4 seconds7.8 seconds
Mazda RX-8 is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda RX-8 engine produces 55 HP more power than BMW 3 series, but torque is 134 NM less than BMW 3 series. Thanks to more power Mazda RX-8 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 12.74.8
Real fuel consumption: 13.1 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The BMW 3 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda RX-8 consumes 7.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda RX-8 could require 1185 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda RX-8 consumes 7.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
Fuel tank capacity: 61 litres63 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 480 km in combined cycle1310 km in combined cycle
570 km on highway1530 km on highway
460 km with real consumption1050 km with real consumption
BMW 3 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 160'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 3 series engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 9 years17 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 1 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 3 series might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The BMW 3 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.46 m4.58 m
Width: 1.77 m1.78 m
Height: 1.34 m1.40 m
Mazda RX-8 is smaller.
Mazda RX-8 is 12 cm shorter than the BMW 3 series, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 6 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 215 litres440 litres
BMW 3 series has more luggage space.
Mazda RX-8 has 225 litres less trunk space than the BMW 3 series.
Turning diameter: 10.6 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 3 series, which means Mazda RX-8 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7321`900
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 38007600
Pros and Cons: Mazda RX-8 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv