Mazda RX-8 2003 vs Toyota Celica 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda RX-8 is available with both manual and automatic gearboxes, whereas Toyota Celica is available only with manual gearbox. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda RX-8 is available with rear wheel drive, while Toyota Celica can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 | 1.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 - 250 HP | 143 - 192 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 - 220 NM | 170 - 180 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 7.2 seconds | 7.4 - 8.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 11.4 | 7.7 - 8.4 | |
|
Mazda RX-8 petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Toyota Celica. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.35 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.32 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda RX-8 is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda RX-8 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`779 | ~ 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda RX-8 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |