Mazda RX-8 2003 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.3 | 4.0 - 5.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 192 - 250 HP | 212 - 540 HP | |
| Torque: | 211 - 220 NM | 325 - 691 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 - 7.2 seconds | 4.5 - 7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 - 11.4 | 10.4 - 13.0 | |
|
Mazda RX-8 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.40 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.34 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Mazda RX-8 is smaller. Mazda RX-8 is 37 cm shorter than the Ford Mustang, 10 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda RX-8 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 290 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
290 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mustang has more luggage space. Mazda RX-8 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`779 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 11 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda RX-8 has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |