Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Ford Probe 1993
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 118 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mazda MX-6 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda MX-6 engine produces 2 HP less power than Ford Probe, but torque is 3 NM more than Ford Probe. Despite less power, Mazda MX-6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Probe is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda MX-6 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-6 could require 30 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-6 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Probe. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 59 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.31 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda MX-6 is 4 cm longer than the Ford Probe, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 0.4 metres less than that of the Ford Probe. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 3800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
Ford Probe has
| |