Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 186 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
Toyota Celica is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MX-6 engine produces 59 HP less power than Toyota Celica, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Toyota Celica. Due to the lower power, Mazda MX-6 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 9.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mazda MX-6 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-6 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda MX-6 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 670 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 626 | Used also on Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda MX-6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
| Mazda MX-6 is 20 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 283 litres | |
|
Mazda MX-6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda MX-6 has 121 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mazda MX-6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`610 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |