Mazda MX-6 1991 vs Toyota Celica 1994
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 116 HP | |
| Torque: | 173 NM | 154 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.2 seconds | |
| Mazda MX-6 and Toyota Celica have the same engine power, but Mazda MX-6 torque is 19 NM more than Toyota Celica. Mazda MX-6 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 7.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 8.2 l/100km | |
|
The Toyota Celica is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda MX-6 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MX-6 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-6 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 9 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 626 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla, Toyota Carina E | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Celica might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mazda MX-6 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.42 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.31 m | 1.30 m | |
| Mazda MX-6 is 20 cm longer than the Toyota Celica, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda MX-6 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 404 litres | 283 litres | |
|
Mazda MX-6 has more luggage capacity. Mazda MX-6 has 121 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Celica. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-6 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Celica, which means Mazda MX-6 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`510 | 1`510 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-6 has
|
Toyota Celica has
| |