Mazda MX-5 2009 vs Renault Megane 2010

 
Mazda MX-5
2009 - 2013
Renault Megane
2010 - 2012
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 160 HP180 HP
Torque: 188 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.6 seconds7.8 seconds
Mazda MX-5 engine produces 20 HP less power than Renault Megane, whereas torque is 112 NM less than Renault Megane. Despite less power, Mazda MX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.68.1
Real fuel consumption: 8.4 l/100km8.8 l/100km
The Mazda MX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda MX-5 consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane, which means that by driving the Mazda MX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MX-5 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Megane.
Fuel tank capacity: 50 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
840 km on highway950 km on highway
590 km with real consumption680 km with real consumption
Renault Megane gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Renault Megane) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MX-5) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Engines

Engine production duration: 13 years15 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda 5, Mazda CX-5Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Renault Grand Espace
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Megane might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Renault Megane engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.02 m4.49 m
Width: 1.72 m1.81 m
Height: 1.26 m1.43 m
Mazda MX-5 is smaller.
Mazda MX-5 is 46 cm shorter than the Renault Megane, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 18 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 150 litres211 litres
Renault Megane has more luggage space.
Mazda MX-5 has 61 litres less trunk space than the Renault Megane.
Turning diameter: 10 meters10.9 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 0.9 metres less than that of the Renault Megane, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3751`926
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
above average

below average
Mazda MX-5 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Renault Megane has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than Mazda MX-5, so Mazda MX-5 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): no data7600
Pros and Cons: Mazda MX-5 has
  • timing chain engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Renault Megane has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv