Mazda MX-5 2008 vs Chrysler PT Cruiser 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda MX-5 is available with rear wheel drive, while Chrysler PT Cruiser can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 | 2.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 - 161 HP | 143 - 223 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 188 NM | 220 - 332 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9.9 seconds | 7.6 - 12.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.0 | 9.4 - 10.4 | |
|
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler PT Cruiser. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.29 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.54 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 4 cm shorter than the Chrysler PT Cruiser, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 29 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 210 litres | |
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has more luggage space. Mazda MX-5 has 60 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler PT Cruiser. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 2 metres less than that of the Chrysler PT Cruiser, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`375 | ~ 1`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 4600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser has
| |