Mazda MX-5 2008 vs Volvo C70 2009
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Mazda MX-5 is available with rear wheel drive, while Volvo C70 can be equipped with front wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 126 - 161 HP | 136 - 220 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 - 188 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 - 9.9 seconds | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.0 - 8.0 | 5.9 - 9.6 | |
|
Mazda MX-5 petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.25 m | 4.62 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.26 m | 1.40 m | |
|
Mazda MX-5 is smaller. Mazda MX-5 is 36 cm shorter than the Volvo C70, 12 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda MX-5 is 15 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 150 litres | 404 litres | |
|
Volvo C70 has more luggage space. Mazda MX-5 has 254 litres less trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MX-5 is 2 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means Mazda MX-5 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`375 | ~ 2`108 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MX-5 has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |