Mazda MPV 1996 vs Mitsubishi Space Runner 1995

 
Mazda MPV
1996 - 1999
Mitsubishi Space Runner
1995 - 1999
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP82 HP
Torque: 277 NM172 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 16.4 seconds17.8 seconds
Mazda MPV is more dynamic to drive.
Mazda MPV engine produces 33 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Runner, whereas torque is 105 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Runner. Thanks to more power Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.98.1
The Mitsubishi Space Runner is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mazda MPV consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MPV could require 120 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 74 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle740 km in combined cycle
Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Mitsubishi Space Runner) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MPV) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.27 m
Width: 1.83 m1.70 m
Height: 1.75 m1.66 m
Mazda MPV is larger.
Mazda MPV is 40 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Runner, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 9 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 282 litres676 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 282 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data676 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1060 litres1498 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Runner (by 438 litres).
Turning diameter: no data10.2 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`370no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data600
Pros and Cons: Mazda MPV has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Mitsubishi Space Runner has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv