Mazda MPV 1996 vs Volkswagen Sharan 1997

 
Mazda MPV
1996 - 1999
Volkswagen Sharan
1997 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 3.0 Petrol2.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 148 HP174 HP
Torque: 230 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.9 seconds11.8 seconds
Volkswagen Sharan is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda MPV engine produces 26 HP less power than Volkswagen Sharan, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Volkswagen Sharan. Due to the lower power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.911.7
Mazda MPV consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Sharan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MPV could require 30 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 74 litres75 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 620 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
790 km on highway840 km on highway

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Sharan) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Mazda MPV) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions.

Dimensions

Length: 4.67 m4.62 m
Width: 1.83 m1.81 m
Height: 1.75 m1.73 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mazda MPV is 5 cm longer than the Volkswagen Sharan, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 2 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seatsno data
Trunk capacity: 335 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 335 litresno data
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1060 litresno data
Turning diameter: no data11.7 meters
Gross weight (kg): 2`3102`000
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): no data1000
Pros and Cons:
    Volkswagen Sharan has
    • more power
    • more dynamic
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv