Mazda MPV 1999 vs Mitsubishi Space Wagon 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 178 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a more dynamic driving. Mazda MPV engine produces 14 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Wagon, whereas torque is 3 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Wagon. Due to the lower power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 9.2 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Wagon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MPV consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MPV could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 63 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 44 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Outlander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Wagon might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Wagon engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.60 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mazda MPV is larger. Mazda MPV is 15 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 1930 litres | |
| In 7-seat version Mazda MPV has more luggage space (by 54 litres). The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Wagon (by 330 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.4 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Wagon, which means Mazda MPV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Mitsubishi Space Wagon has
| |