Mazda MPV 1999 vs Hyundai H1 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 21 seconds | |
|
Mazda MPV is more dynamic to drive. Mazda MPV engine produces 12 HP more power than Hyundai H1, but torque is 6 NM less than Hyundai H1. Thanks to more power Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 6.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 13.5 | |
|
The Mazda MPV is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mazda MPV consumes 3.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai H1, which means that by driving the Mazda MPV over 15,000 km in a year you can save 510 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 480 km in combined cycle | |
| 810 km on highway | 650 km on highway | ||
| Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Mazda MPV) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Hyundai H1) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 630'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda MPV engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 323, Mazda Premacy | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Hyundai H1 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 5.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.96 m | |
| Mazda MPV is 29 cm shorter than the Hyundai H1, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 22 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | 294 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | 4400 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Hyundai H1 (by 2800 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`230 | 2`650 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
| |