Mazda MPV 2003 vs Honda CR-V 2004

 
Mazda MPV
2003 - 2005
Honda CR-V
2004 - 2006
Body: Minivan / MPVCrossover / SUV
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 136 HP140 HP
Torque: 310 NM340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.2 seconds10.6 seconds
Honda CR-V is a more dynamic driving.
Mazda MPV engine produces 4 HP less power than Honda CR-V, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Honda CR-V. Due to the lower power, Mazda MPV reaches 100 km/h speed 2.6 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.16.7
Real fuel consumption: 8.0 l/100km7.5 l/100km
The Honda CR-V is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mazda MPV consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mazda MPV could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda MPV consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda CR-V.
Fuel tank capacity: 75 litres58 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1050 km in combined cycle860 km in combined cycle
1200 km on highway980 km on highway
930 km with real consumption770 km with real consumption
Mazda MPV gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive)

Honda CR-V 2004: Car features Honda`s real-time four-wheel-drive system, which sends torque to the front wheels under normal conditions. A multi-plate clutch transfers torque to the rear axle when wheel slip is detected (pressure is applied to the clutch by a dual-pump system). To allow ABS to work smoothly, the clutch is also disengaged during braking.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 370'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 3 years8 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mazda 6Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Honda Civic, Honda Accord, Honda FR-V
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Honda CR-V might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.64 m
Width: 1.83 m1.78 m
Height: 1.78 m1.71 m
Mazda MPV is larger.
Mazda MPV is 16 cm longer than the Honda CR-V, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 7 cm higher.
Seats: 7 seats5 seats
Trunk capacity: 294 litres525 litres
Trunk capacity with 7 seats: 294 litresno data
Trunk capacity with 5 seats: no data525 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2745 litres952 litres
The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda MPV (by 1793 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.8 metres more than that of the Honda CR-V, which means Mazda MPV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`395no data
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 12003200
Pros and Cons: Mazda MPV has
  • timing belt engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Honda CR-V has
  • timing chain engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • has 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv