Mazda MPV 1999 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 - 170 HP | 100 - 167 HP | |
| Torque: | 175 - 207 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 9.3 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 - 11.1 | 5.2 - 8.9 | |
|
Mazda MPV petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.61 m | |
| Width: | 1.83 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.74 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Mazda MPV is larger. Mazda MPV is 14 cm longer than the Mazda 626, 11 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 31 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 481 litres | 502 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1600 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda 626 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mazda MPV has 21 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 626. This could mean that the Mazda MPV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626, which means Mazda MPV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`230 | ~ 1`648 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda MPV has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |