Mazda MPV 2003 vs Mazda Premacy 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mazda MPV
2003 - 2005
Mazda Premacy
2001 - 2005
Gearbox: Manual Manual/Automatic
Mazda MPV is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Mazda Premacy has both automatic and manual transmission options.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.31.8 - 2.0

Performance

Power: 136 - 141 HP100 - 131 HP
Torque: 195 - 310 NM152 - 230 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12.7 - 13.2 seconds10.7 - 12.1 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.1 - 10.16.4 - 9.4
Mazda MPV petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda Premacy. On average, Mazda MPV equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.80 m4.34 m
Width: 1.83 m1.70 m
Height: 1.78 m1.60 m
Mazda MPV is larger.
Mazda MPV is 46 cm longer than the Mazda Premacy, 13 cm wider, while the height of Mazda MPV is 18 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 294 litres420 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
2745 litres1848 litres
Despite its longer length, Mazda MPV has 126 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. This could mean that the Mazda MPV uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda MPV (by 897 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.8 meters
The turning circle of the Mazda MPV is 0.6 metres more than that of the Mazda Premacy, which means Mazda MPV can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`333~ 1`799
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Mazda MPV has
  • manual gearbox only
Mazda Premacy has
  • both manual and automatic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv