Mazda Demio 2003 vs Volkswagen Polo 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda Demio is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volkswagen Polo has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.9 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 - 113 HP | 55 - 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 140 NM | 106 - 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10.7 - 17.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.5 - 7.4 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.65 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mazda Demio is larger. Mazda Demio is 3 cm longer than the Volkswagen Polo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mazda Demio is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 270 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 1030 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 60 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 268 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`530 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |