Mazda Demio 2003 vs Suzuki Swift 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mazda Demio is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Suzuki Swift has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mazda Demio is available only with front wheel drive, while Suzuki Swift can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.3 - 1.5 (petrol) | 1.2 - 1.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 91 - 113 HP | 70 - 102 HP | |
| Torque: | 124 - 140 NM | 116 - 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 - 14.2 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 4.6 - 6.5 | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.93 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.68 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.51 m | |
| Mazda Demio is 23 cm longer than the Suzuki Swift, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda Demio is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 213 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1298 litres | 562 litres | |
|
Mazda Demio has more luggage capacity. Mazda Demio has 117 litres more trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Demio (by 736 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 9.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`495 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda Demio has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |