Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Mazda CX-5 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 175 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 420 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 9.4 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 and Mazda CX-5 2015 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.0 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 2015 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mazda CX-5 2012 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 2012 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mazda CX-5 2012 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-5 2015. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1050 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1180 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 720 km with real consumption | 760 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.67 m | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 is 2 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-5 2015, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 2012 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 503 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1620 litres | |
| Mazda CX-5 2012 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-5 2015. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 2012 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-5 2015, which means Mazda CX-5 2012 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`120 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 15 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
| |