Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Mazda CX-7 2009
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 173 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 11.3 seconds | |
| Mazda CX-5 engine produces 23 HP less power than Mazda CX-7, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Mazda CX-7. Despite less power, Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 2.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 435 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 69 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 910 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 820 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 380'000 km | 380'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.65 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is smaller, but higher. Mazda CX-5 is 16 cm shorter than the Mazda CX-7, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 7 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 774 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Mazda CX-5 has 50 litres more trunk space than the Mazda CX-7. The Mazda CX-7 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 846 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-7. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 2`430 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests, but Mazda CX-7 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 9400 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Mazda CX-7 has
| |