Mazda CX-5 2012 vs Nissan Qashqai 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 141 HP | |
| Torque: | 380 NM | 196 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 9 HP more power than Nissan Qashqai, whereas torque is 184 NM more than Nissan Qashqai. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.6 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.9 l/100km | 9.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 3.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 465 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 2.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 56 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1210 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 1360 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 810 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 6, Mazda 3, Mazda CX-7 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Serena | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Nissan Qashqai might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.54 m | 4.38 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.71 m | 1.59 m | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is larger. Mazda CX-5 is 16 cm longer than the Nissan Qashqai, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 505 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | no data | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 75 litres more trunk space than the Nissan Qashqai. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.2 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Nissan Qashqai, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`035 | 1`865 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda CX-5 scores higher in safety tests. The Mazda CX-5 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | above average | below average | |
| Mazda CX-5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Nissan Qashqai has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Mazda CX-5, so Mazda CX-5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 9600 | 10 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Nissan Qashqai has
| |