Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Toyota RAV4 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 149 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 26 HP more power than Toyota RAV4, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Toyota RAV4. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1030 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda CX-5 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mazda 6 | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla Verso, Toyota Verso | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota RAV4 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.57 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.67 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 2 cm shorter than the Toyota RAV4, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 577 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1705 litres | |
|
Toyota RAV4 has more luggage space. Mazda CX-5 has 74 litres less trunk space than the Toyota RAV4. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Toyota RAV4 (by 85 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Toyota RAV4. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`240 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | high | |
| Toyota RAV4 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Mazda CX-5 has serious deffects in 45 percent more cases than Toyota RAV4, so Toyota RAV4 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 12 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Toyota RAV4 has
| |