Mazda CX-5 2015 vs Ford Kuga 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.2 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 175 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 420 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.4 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
|
Mazda CX-5 is more dynamic to drive. Mazda CX-5 engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Kuga, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Ford Kuga. Thanks to more power Mazda CX-5 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.9 | 6.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda CX-5 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga, which means that by driving the Mazda CX-5 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mazda CX-5 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Kuga. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 980 km in combined cycle | 960 km in combined cycle | |
| 1090 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 750 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.56 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.84 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm longer than the Ford Kuga, width is practically the same , while the height of Mazda CX-5 is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 503 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1620 litres | 1568 litres | |
|
Mazda CX-5 has more luggage capacity. Mazda CX-5 has 47 litres more trunk space than the Ford Kuga. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda CX-5 (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.7 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mazda CX-5 is 0.7 metres more than that of the Ford Kuga, which means Mazda CX-5 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`140 | 2`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Ford Kuga has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Mazda CX-5, so Ford Kuga quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 15 000 | 12 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mazda CX-5 has
|
Ford Kuga has
| |